Hong Kong Logistics and Supply Chain MultiTech R&D Centre > R&D Areas > Application & Vetting > Project Vetting
Project Vetting

Vetting Criteria

 
Please refer to Part C of Guide to Filling in the ITSP Applications Form or Part C of Guide to Filling in the TCFS Applications Form.
 

 

Vetting Process

 
I. Platform Research Programme

Vetting Process

  • Applicant submits proposal according to the requirements set in the Call for Proposal.
  • Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of all the Proposals received. If the Proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the Applicants to provide further information.
  • Centre reviews all the proposals with consultation from ITC, and prepares Observation Form for each proposal.
  • Centre Secretariat will select 6-10 panelists from the member of Expert Review Panel (ERP) based on their area of expertise and domain knowledge.
     
    Centre Secretariat sends all ready proposals with Observation Forms to the members of the ERP.
  • With reference to ITC assessment framework, ERP members review all the proposals, make comments and recommendations and give scores for the following four (4) components:
    i.   Innovation and Technology
    ii.  Technical Capability
    iii. Financial Considerations
    iv. Existence of a Holistic Plan to Realisation/Commercialisation
     
    ERP members send all comments to Centre.
  • With reference to ERP's recommendations and scores, Centre Secretariat and ITC will jointly determine Preliminary Scores (all components of the ITC assessment framework) for each proposal and to shortlist proposals for TC vetting.
  • Centre sends the shortlists to TC 2 weeks before TC meeting. TC members can request Centre to add other proposals into the shortlists by informing the Centre one (1) week before TC meeting.
  • Centre selects a good representation of ERP panelists to attend the TC meeting and share their comments on respective proposals. Subject to their availability, it is desirable to have two/ three ERP panelists attending the TC meeting to explain views of the ERP. The ERP panelists will not participate in the TC decision process and shall be excused from the meeting when the TC concludes the Final Score and Recommendation Decision.
  • With reference to ITC assessment framework, TC meets to evaluate all the proposals, taking into consideration the (i) ERP's recommendations and scores; (ii) Preliminary Score; (iii) ITC assessment.
    Only shortlisted applicants will be invited to attend the TC meeting. 
    For each proposal, TC Chairman will take into account TC members' opinions to conclude a Final Score and Recommendation Decision.
    If a Proposal is vetted as "Not Recommended" by the TC, notification with reasons will be sent to the Applicant. Process ends.
    If a Proposal is vetted as "Recommended" by the TC, TC will make recommendation to ITC.
  • Centre Secretariat may, based on TC's recommendation: 
    instruct Applicant to update the Proposal
    negotiate Intellectual Property (IP) terms and conditions with Applicant 
    The Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time 
  • Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the Proposal and forwards the revised Proposal to ITC.
     
  • Commissioner for Innovation & Technology (CIT) makes decision regarding the Proposal.
    If CIT approves the Proposal, ITC will notify Centre Secretariat. The Centre Secretariat will inform the Applicant and respective ERP panellists, if any. Process proceeds to contract negotiation.
    If CIT does not approve the Proposal, ITC will notify Centre Secretariat. Centre Secretariat will notify Applicant and report back to TC.
  • Contract negotiation and signing
 
 
II. Partnership Research Programme

Vetting Process

  • Applicant submits proposal to the Centre.
  • Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal received. If the proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the applicant to provide further information.
  • Centre Secretariat reviews the proposal and prepares Observation form together with Centre's CEO recommendations for the proposal.
  • Centre Secretariat arranges Pre-Panel meeting with Science Advisor and the technical team of ITC; and forwards the proposal to ITC Administration team.
  • Centre Secretariat arranges Panel meeting. The Panel constitutes of CIT or the CIT's delegate, Technology committee (TC) Chairman and Centre CEO, where the TC Chairman will serve as the Chairman of the Panel.
  • Panel members meet to evaluate the proposal and make decisions on behalf of TC.
    If the proposal is vetted as "No" by the Panel, notification with reasons will be sent to applicant.
    If the proposal is vetted as "Yes" by the Panel, Centre Secretariat may instruct applicant to update the proposal based on Panel's recommendations.
  • Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time.
  • Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal and forwards the revised proposal to CIT for funding considerations.
 
 
III. Public Sector Trial Scheme

Vetting Process

  • Applicant submits proposal to the Centre.
  • Centre Secretariat, with consultation from ITC, reviews and checks that the proposal received is complete. If the proposal is not considered ready, Centre may request the applicant to provide further information.
  • Centre Secretariat arranges Panel meeting. The Panel constitutes of ITC representative, Technology committee (TC) Chairman and Centre CEO, where the TC Chairman will serve as the Chairman of the Panel.
  • Panel members meet to evaluate the proposal and make decisions on behalf of TC.
    If the proposal is vetted as "No" by the Panel, notification with reasons will be sent to applicant.
    If the proposal is vetted as "Yes" by the Panel, Centre Secretariat may instruct applicant to update the proposal based on Panel's recommendations.
  • Applicant has to submit revised proposal in time.
  • Centre Secretariat checks for completeness of the proposal and forwards the revised proposal to CIT for funding considerations.
 

 

Assessment Committee

 

Technology Committee

 
Chairman
Ir. Dr. Alan LAM    
 
Members
Prof Gary CHAN  Ms Rebecca PUN Ar Prof Ada FUNG, BBS
Mr William YIM Ir. Dr. Angus CHEUNG  
 

Members of Expert Review Panel

 

Mr. Abraham CHAN Mr. Adrian Y.H. Lai Ir. Alain Tang
Dr. Albert LIU Dr. Albert Kai-Sun Wong Prof. Albert KH Kwan
Mr. Alex Chan Ir. Alex W.H. Choy Dr. Alfred NG
Ms. Amy Chan Mr. Andrew CHENG Prof. Andy CHOW
Ms. Angela Yuen Mr. Argon Ho Prof. Ben Chen
Dr. Benjamin YEN Dr. Brian Kan Wing Mak Prof. Cecilia, Wai Ping Li-Tsang
Mr. Charles WONG Ir. Cheung Tai Raymond Choi Prof. Christina Wong
Mr. Chris Huang Dr. CL Chan Mr. Damien WU
Mr. Daniel Lee Ir Prof. Daniel HK Chow Prof. Daniel Zhuoyu LONG
Mr. David WONG Prof. Dit-Yan YEUNG Miss. Dona CHAN
Prof. Dong Yang Mr. Eddie Lee Dr. Edward CHAN
Mr. Edwin Chan Dr. Edwin Yu Mr. Envel Leung
Prof. Eric Lo Mr. Gary YEUNG Prof. Gary, Shueng-Han CHAN
Prof. George HUANG Dr. Gina Jiang Mr. Hailson Yu
Prof. Heng LI Dr. Horace Mui Prof. Huamin QU
Prof. Hui LIN Mr. Ivan LEE Mr. Jack Zhang
Prof. Jack C.P. Cheng Prof. James Tin-Yau Kwok Mr. Jimmy Pang
Prof. Jimmy  Ho Man Lee Prof. Jin QI Prof. Jintao KE
Prof. Joan Zuo Mr. John WONG Mr. Johnson Yim
Mr. Joseph Yuen Ir. Prof. Joseph Kee-Yin NG Mr. K.K. SUEN
Prof. Kam Fai Wong Prof. Kam Tim Woo Dr. Kam-Pui CHOW
Prof. Keith K.C. CHAN Prof. Ke-Li WU Mr. Kelvin Ko
Mr. Kelvin Lee Mr. Ken Chung Ir. Kenneth Chan
Prof. Kenneth Kin Yip Wong Dr. Kin Lai CHUNG Mr. Kinsen Lee
Prof. Lap-Pui Chau Prof. Leanne Chan Prof. Linda Xiao
Mr. Matthew TAM Prof. Matthew MF Yuen Mr. Miles WEN
Dr. Neo Chan Mr. Nick Chan Prof. Oliver Chiu-Sing CHOY
Mr. Owen Leung Ir. Pak-Kin Cheung Dr. Pan HUI
Mr. PARRY NG Prof. Patrick YUE Mr. Paul Won
Dr. Peggy Lau Prof. Peifeng Ma Mr. Peter Hon Yu Ng
Mr. Peter KW Shum Mr. Peter Wah-Tim Shum Prof. Pheng Ann Heng
Dr. Philip LAM Mr. Philip HO Dr. Qi WU
Ms. Rabo Hung Yuk WONG Prof. Ray Cheung Dr. Ray ZHONG
Prof. Raymond Kai-Yu TONG Mr. Ricardo LEE Mr. Ronnie SUNG
Ir Prof. Samson KH TAI Mr. Samuel LO Ir Prof. SC WONG
Ir Prof. Henry CHUNG Prof. Siu Wing CHENG Ir. Mr. Stephen K.C. CHAN
Dr. Steven Tat Man Yip Ir. Steven Yee Ming LUI Ir. Mr. Stewart CHUN
Dr. Sunny CHAI Mr. Sunny HO Dr. Terence LAU
Dr. Teresa Law Ms. Teresa NGAN Prof. Thomas NG
Mr. Tony, Yiu-Tong CHAN Mr. Victor Choi Prof. Wallace Lai
Mr. Warwick SO Prof. Wenzhong, John SHI Prof. Ir. William H.K. Lam
Dr. Kwok-Wai CHEUNG Ir. Dr. Shu Sang Cheung Dr. Wilson W.S. LU
Ir. Wilson Wai Shun Kwok Dr. Wing Kwong Yau Dr. Winson YEUNG
Prof. Wu CHEN Prof. Xiao-Li DING Prof. Xiwen Bai
Prof. Xu Jeffrey YU Prof. Yang Chai Mr. Ying Li
Prof. Yong Hong KUO Mr. York MOK Prof. Yun-hui LIU
Dr. Zijun ZHANG Dr. David Leung Mr. Victor Lam